A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among possible neighbours above the construction of the wall in a coastal web site inside of a north Dublin suburb, a scenario which includes attracted national notice following an Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed spouse and children house at Sutton Strand, the place allegations of organizing breaches, environmental issues, and very long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled to the courts. The Irish Periods write-up about René Collier as well as Irish Moments article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as a local disagreement has progressed right into a really publicised lawful struggle.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing about development will work at the internet site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a firm director respectively, search for to develop their household dwelling. The situation is now emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, wherever development pressures collide with environmental protections and the sensitivities of founded inhabitants. According to the Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall remaining constructed by their potential neighbours goes further than the boundaries permitted underneath organizing authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, equally residents of Dublin Street, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their scheduling permission by developing a wall past the boundaries of their web site, resulting in an encroachment on a Specific Area of Conservation. The SAC designation is central to your dispute, as such places are subject matter to strict controls underneath European and Irish environmental law. In their courtroom filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have lasting ecological penalties, specifically inside of a sensitive coastal setting which include Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their preparing permission, and say the wall, that's partly created, is in the proper posture. Their lawful group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful advancement. The pair accuse litigants of looking for to halt homebuilding so as to maintain their perspective, an allegation which has been repeated in court and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the center of many coastal organizing disputes, in which views of the sea are each extremely prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Instances report naming René Collier and Paul Feely described spectacular initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the positioning, In line with sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Times. In one account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Situations, an image that has considering the fact that develop into emblematic on the intensity with the dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to gather Visible evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and protected land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning through the sea Irish Occasions claimed, describing how the two Adult males entered the water all through significant climatic conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the website grew to become Just about the most putting descriptions to emerge from court reporting. The Irish Periods article about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ perception the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The gatherings at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were coated in detail with the countrywide push. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Situations 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Times January 27 2026 became extensively searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the history and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court listened to even further submissions on whether interim orders must be granted to halt construction pending a full Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a key instant in the lawful timeline.
Within the Main with the dispute is often a disagreement about boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as made, goes past what was authorized and intrudes into protected land. They argue that it's not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by career, has become described as meticulous in his assessment of setting up paperwork, maps, and conditions hooked up for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is enthusiastic by concern for environmental security and adherence to arranging law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting in its place that it is about making sure that advancement at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they may have described their extensive-standing connection to the world as well as their awareness of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed on their own as a pair merely seeking to create a relatives household in accordance With all the legislation. They deny which the wall encroaches on the Exclusive Area of Conservation and say that each one will work have been carried out determined by Experienced guidance and accredited designs. Their legal professionals have argued that the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and that the dramatic actions of René Collier and Paul Feely, which includes getting into the sea for the duration of a storm, never alter the fundamental points.
The situation has also elevated broader questions about how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal internet site is becoming a shorthand description for a situation that many observers see as more Irish Times article about René Collier and more typical. As sea ranges rise and coastal erosion intensifies, the specific delineation concerning non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is becoming more contentious.
The Irish Situations short article about René Collier famous that the businessman experienced Formerly been involved in area advocacy on setting up and environmental troubles, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Periods write-up about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people from pretty diverse Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand scenario.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the site with the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining the unusual lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by waist-significant water for the duration of a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded through waist-substantial h2o throughout a storm to photograph the location Irish Times are phrases that appeared continuously in protection, reflecting both of those the physical actuality on the coastline as well as symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown determination; for critics, they illustrated what they see as an excessive strategy.
Since the High Court proceedings continue on, the outcome remains uncertain. The court need to decide if the wall as created complies with setting up permission and no matter if any encroachment into a Unique Region of Conservation has occurred. The legal arguments are complex, involving interpretation of maps, tidal data, and planning circumstances. Yet the human element stays central: neighbours who have to Dwell alongside one another extensive following the legal costs are actually paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above construction is effective at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the situation extend outside of that deal with. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the value of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how speedily a neighborhood disagreement can escalate when essential difficulties including environmental security and home legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a place of purely natural attractiveness and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre with the dispute stands partly developed, a physical manifestation of unresolved legal concerns. Whether or not it can in the end be altered, taken out, or done as prepared will depend on the court docket’s conclusions. Till then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probably continue on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Probably the most closely watched organizing disputes in north Dublin in recent times.